Mike Dulak grew up Catholic in Southern California, but by his teen years, he began skipping Mass and driving straight to the shore to play guitar, watch the waves and enjoy the beauty of the morning. “And it felt more spiritual than any time I set foot in a church,” he recalled.

Nothing has changed that view in the ensuing decades.

“Most religions are there to control people and get money from them,” said Dulak, now 76, of Rocheport, Missouri. He also cited sex abuse scandals in Catholic and Southern Baptist churches. “I can’t buy into that,” he said.

        • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          78
          ·
          1 year ago

          Religion was at the center of everything 500 years ago. It’s gonna take credit for a lot of stuff because you could barely do anything art related without religious involvement.

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do like the sense of harmony that comes from singing together, but yes you don’t need a church for that.

        • JesusLikesYourButt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Shining’s opening theme was based on a medieval Christian hymn, day of wrath or Dies Irae. I love deep vocals and latin lyrics, it’s so soothing.

        • seth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Many older hymns were religious words added to melodies ripped off from pub/folk songs. Perhaps surprisingly, some hymnals attribute the original composers or mention where they were adapted from. Perhaps unsurprising, I was so bored with hearing the same sermon messages throughout my youth that I would read the hymnal indices to figure out which composers I liked the best…

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree…except the Sagrada Familia which fills me with irrational anger. Looks like Poseidon walked on shore and squeezed out a sand turd. It’s so goddamn hideous to me. If I was the god who Gaudi built it for, he would not make it into heaven. I hate it so much.

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Some religions. Depending on how you use the word. Legally Buddhism is a federally recognized religion for example.

      And it has so little in common with how Christian’s use the word I consider it a misnomer. But I’ll keep enjoying the federal protections.

      • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish you ppl would stop with your fetishization for any religion outside of the Abrahamic ones. Sikhs are just like any group of ppl and have committed fucked shit in the name of their ideology. Imperial (let’s invade and massacre Asia) Japan was Buddhist who used it as justification for nationalism, violence, and persecution. Which sounds pretty damn similar to what Jews, Muslims, and Christians do/did. And let’s not forget Hindu nationalism and their problematic caste system

        And no this isn’t a bashing of religion as a whole because I personally find the argument that religion is the root of all evil as childish. I have no issues with anyone believing anything they want. It only becomes a problem when you feel the need to impose your belief on others. EVERY group including religion, race, class, ethnicity, sex, political party, etc is guilty of that

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          The non-Abrahamic religions stick with thr peace and love parts in the US because they are not the dominant religion. Any religion ends up being cooped into being used to justify violence when it is on top even when the core tenets are supposed to be peaceful and accepting.

          This also tends to be true of most human organizational structures, but religion adds a layer that make it easier for members to accept extreme behavior by the people in their group.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There were Roman Christians who made passionate arguments for freedom of religion, before they took over. Not so much after.

        • treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People will fetishize anything and use anything to justify violence.

          Buddhist practitioners can be as dogmatic as Christians, but having been brought up as one and studied the other extensively, Buddhism is not a religion in the Western sense of the word.

          In fact there’s many teachings on avoiding dogmatic views in both ancient and modern Buddhism. Because dogmatism brings about the exact suffering we’re talking about.

          Yes, Buddhists are as failable as anyone else. But the heart of the dharma begins with right view, which essentially means, don’t be dogmatic!

          Which is the exact opposite of how I was brought up in a Christian family.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Buddhism is not a religion in the Western sense of the word.

            Every religion claims that. Christians will tell you it is a lifestyle and a relationship. Jews will tell you it is a religion and culture. Buddhists will claim to be a philosophy and a mindset. No one wants to admit that they are just another way of doing X.

            • treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Of the three you listed only one doesn’t follow commandments given by an invisible supernatural entity.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Cool we are just going to ignore all the Buddhists gods, like the seven headed snake (commonly depicted as the Buddha of Wednesday afternoon) and Maru. As well as the gods they borrowed along the way like Genash and about a million dead monks. We are also going to ignore all the passages in the Pali where the Siddathrata talks about his past incarnations and how he decided to decided to come to earth one more time to save humanity.

                Hey remind me again, in the heart sutra what is the reason Siddathrata gives for the importance of giving gold to monks? I forget. Maybe I forget because he refers to it as a secret mystery.

                Go ahead and continue. I want you to tell me more about what half remembered YouTube video from a fourlong secular Buddhist you saw once. I am just going to sit here and sort thru the hundreds of photos I have of me in South East Asia.

                • treefrog@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’m only replying to your top paragraph because I sense a lot of hostility in your post and don’t have the patience at the moment to wade through it carefully.

                  Buddhism doesn’t extinguish other beliefs when it interacts with them. Nagas (the seven headed snake, who is not a God but more like a spirit, is a naga) already existed in southeast Asia prior to Buddhism. Likewise Genesh is a Hindu diety that already existed in India.

                  Some Zen Buddhist traditions even go so far as to draw parallels with Christian beliefs in the Kingdom of God and the ultimate dimension (a Buddhist concept for how everything is connected and interdependent).

                  Finally, I didn’t argue that Buddhism doesn’t incorporate the idea of spiritual beings (Gods, Demons, they can all be found in most Buddhist traditions). But they’re not beings to worship or revere simply on account of their spiritual status. Or to listen too without question like in authoritarian belief systems. So, it’s likely your post is a straw man but also possible you misunderstood my position and I didn’t communicate clearly enough. Either way, what you’re arguing against wasn’t my position. (See italics right above and below if you need clarification).

                  The Buddha said don’t take my word. See for yourself. And Buddhism is being incorporated under other names in all sorts of modern psychology practices. Because the shit works and is based on science (investigation of mental phenomenon with an open and unbiased mind) not dogma.

                  I hope someday you understand the difference. But I can tell by your tone that nothing I can say today will change your mind.

                  So this post isn’t for you. But the silent witnesses on the fence.

                  Take care.

        • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Buddhism was probably 10% the justification for nationalism that Shinto was in Japan, so that’s a pretty bad example.

          Also, using Buddhism to encourage nationalism ≠ Buddhisms fault

            • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I would make the same argument, and say that radicalized religion is the issue, not religion itself.

              Most every religion becomes radicalized over time, but that doesnt define the inital religious teachings.

              So yeah, Christian nationalism ≠ Christianity’s fault.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Moralists with authoritarian leanings are the problem.

          Plenty of those around nowadays who, instead of a religions, latch on to some well meaning cause and then proceed to try and shove other people around under the cover of said cause, bringing along the more tribalist (hence unthinking and easilly manipulated with the right words) members of the cause, all the way to pretty much pogroms and purges (though, fortunatelly, not normally involving killing people).

          Whilst the vehicle (religion, some ideologies, politics, any “cause” supposedly beyond questioning including nationalism), being something that most people follow in a mindless way is ideal for such subvertion and abuse as an easy source of supporting usefull idiots for people indulging their lust for power over others) the reall problem is, IMHO, a certain type of individual who will seek social situations they can abuse to be powerful (all the way down to the school social bully who uses connection rather than physicallity to have power over others), so it’s really such people we should be weary of and alert for rather than their chosen vehicles.

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah absolutely, and the problem is they’ll always find an excuse - someone on here recently argued to me that since we punch Nazis we should also punch people who use words like ‘unalive’ because it’s an attack on our culture - he was being entirely serious too.

            You can see people rubbing their hands in glee at every climate change story too and it’s scary, I’ve been involved with a lot of green groups and eco-positive movements which are full of wonderful people who really care about making a better world - then there are overly online lunatics who never lifted a finger to help native species or anything like that but have decided it’s a wonderful excuse to live out their most destructive and hateful fantasies.

            Religion is a way of harnessing that awful impulse in people and using it for the benefit of a small theocratic aristocracy, it’s a way of saying ‘you can get away with being the awfull person you want to be if you do it in the name of our gang and to our enemies’

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Buddhism has a talent for conversion by syncretism. Tibetian Buddhism is Buddhism meeting Tibetian Shamanism, Chan/Zen is Buddhism meeting Taoism (which already was very close), both Therevada and Mayayana are rather more Hindu, and what we’re seeing in the west is Humanist/Christian, depending on the practitioner. A good dividing line might be belief in reincarnation: Legit Atheists don’t care, hell-conditioned folks find relief, whereas originally the whole thing was Hindu and Buddhism calls it dhukka (suffering, also mind that it’s tied into the caste system) and promises a way to break out of it. So what was a jail in one context serves as a comfy blanket in another.

          In that sense it’s very much a mistake to see Buddhism as a uniform whole, or western adoption as appropriation or fetish, or really infer terribly much about one strain of Buddhism from the other.

          Then, second note: All those eastern things should be compared, if you want to compare them properly, not to western religion or churches but to that and the whole philosophical heritage dating back to at least Socrates. And gods know in that context we don’t need religion to fuck up, we’re still recovering from Descartes and like to ignore inconvenient truths such that Newton was an Alchemist. Christians like to ignore that all the stuff that is actually valuable about Christianity, is more than memes furnished to propagate the system (and doing damage while doing so), is lifted from the Stoics. Racism once was “scientific”. I could go on and on.

      • qooqie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And sihks! Those guys are just the absolute nicest people I’ve ever met, kinda wish I knew more about it

        • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Buddhist sects as a whole are not exception, but I couldn’t find an example of violence at “its inception”. All the examples I could find are from much later.

  • Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even religious groups hate organized religion. They just make an exception for the one they happen to be part of.

    • NegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      101
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How thoughtful of God to arrange matters so that, wherever you happen to be born, the local religion always turns out to be the true one

      • Richard Dawkins
      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ricky Gervais said something super interesting to Stephen Colbert, who is a Catholic. It was something like “We actually agree on a lot more than you think. You think that thousands of other religions aren’t true. I think the same thing, plus one more.”

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sometimes I wonder what Abraham would think knowing literal billions of people worldwide worship the god he made up.

        And what he thinks about how all the different sects all hate each other so much.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am a Christian and am willing to throw myself into the ring.

      I think we deserve all the hate we are receiving and more. I am a firm believer of the separation of church and state, because I actually have studied the history of that phrase, and I know Christians wrote it in blood.

      Very little of that matters though, because the balance of power has been shifted too much into our area.

      We were supposed to minister to people, wash people’s feet, love their neighbor.

      Christian’s were supposed to be servants of our communities, and instead we became the rulers. Instead of showing compassion and understanding, we are tyrants with no passion, logic, or understanding for our fellow people.

      Just the love of Money. “In God we Trust”

      There will be a power shift back, and I don’t think Christian’s are ready for the blow-back. But I will say, we will deserve it, for we have become vile tyrants.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        Moore [a former Evangelical leader] told NPR in an interview released Tuesday that multiple pastors had told him they would quote the Sermon on the Mount, specifically the part that says to “turn the other cheek,” when preaching. Someone would come up after the service and ask, “Where did you get those liberal talking points?”
        “What was alarming to me is that in most of these scenarios, when the pastor would say, ‘I’m literally quoting Jesus Christ,’ the response would not be, ‘I apologize.’ The response would be, ‘Yes, but that doesn’t work anymore. That’s weak,’” Moore said. “When we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then we’re in a crisis.”
        Moore said he thinks a large part of the issue is how divisive U.S. politics are, which is now spilling over into the church. He pointed to how a lot of issues are “packaged in terms of existential threat,” leading to the belief among everyone, not just evangelical Christians, that “desperate times call for desperate measures.”
        https://newrepublic.com/post/174950/christianity-today-editor-evangelicals-call-jesus-liberal-weak

        “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”
        ― Mahatma Gandhi

      • abort_christian_babies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Genuinely appreciate you sharing your thoughts.

        Full disclosure. Even as a somewhat aggressive agnostic, I fully support religious freedoms and will stand up for peaceful religious rights.

        I must draw a line when I or others become victims of religious ideologies though, as you suggested.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, you threw yourself in here, so I feel this is fair game…

        Listen, while I certainly respect some of the concessions you are making here in acknowledging the issues with the broader issues of modern Christianity, at a very fundamental level the core beliefs are problematic for a modern society.

        My guess is that you believe a dead body came back to life and floated up into the sky.

        In part, I make this assumption because Paul effectively mandated this as a litmus test in 1 Cor 15 in response to Christians at the time who rejected that belief.

        So you believe that things outside the scope of what is naturally possible has occurred.

        This is then tied to a belief of inherent unworthiness such that without this event having occurred, you are somehow deserving of suffering and it is only through this event that you could have avoided such a fate.

        You were most likely fed these beliefs as a child - beliefs people in the first generation after Jesus weren’t even all that keen on - and you will likely continue to pass them along generationally.

        The entire time effectively ignoring that the version of Christianity which survived was simply the one that had successfully adapted beliefs in line with supporting authoritarianism of the Roman monarchy, of slavery, and of financing the organization out of the pockets of its members, etc - ideas that I’m skeptical you’d end up endorsing if they were positioned to you on their own, and are each beliefs that can be individually challenged on their connection to a historical Jesus in the first place.

        So the social exchange of even a “good Christianity” minus the worst parts of today’s oversteps is still one in which children are raised to believe in magic, in their inherent unworthiness without the religion, of continuing on outdated and obsolete social norms and practices, and on preserving ideas that benefit authoritarianism.

        Much as I think you’d probably agree it wouldn’t be good for people growing up in a world of science and technology to be indoctrinated with beliefs about Muhammad having been able to split the moon in half or a belief that the universe is in fact the dream of a giant turtle, beliefs that you yourself subscribe to happen to run counter to everything from an evidenced based approach to understanding the world and our place in it.

        Christian certainty in their beliefs led to suppression of ideas ranging from the notion matter was made up of indivisible parts (atomism) to the idea life that existed around us was not from intelligent design but simply based on what survived to reproduce and what did not - both ideas present and broadly discussed in Jesus’s day.

        With all due respect for the freedom to have faith in something, at a certain point faith should not be put on a pedestal over evidence backed evaluations and it is necessary to let go of the past in order to embrace the future.

      • calypsopub@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fellow Christian here, well said! I am so sickened by Christmas who want to use the government to force their beliefs on everyone else.

        • abort_christian_babies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are the only person (so far) that’s understood this distinction in my name.

          It’s intended to be inflammatory but also to make the point you did.

          • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Isn’t there at least one sect out there that believes in “Christian while a fetus”? There are so many denominations it’s hard to tell. I just had a quick look at the wiki page on original sin and at least the LDS people believe there’s no need for children under 8 to be baptized, though I’m not sure if that means the kids are LDS while younger than that (or fetal). There was a bit about some Quakers rejecting original sin as well, but again I’m not too sure of the implications.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve heard about the “rise of the nones” for fucking years now. I’m in my mid 30s. When the fuck will this trend translate into policy reform

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep.

        Doesn’t matter how religious voters are when the options are both hardcore Christian.

        Like, Biden not being actively anti-abortion was enough to get American bishops to start talking if they should try and get every Catholic church in America to refuse to give him communion.

        He’s still not really pro-abortion, and we’ll never really know if that’s because his incredibly organized church is against it, or if he just doesn’t care enough to push for codifying abortion rights.

        He’s the most high profile because he’s president, but lots of House Reps and Senators are in the same boat.

    • soycapitan451@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Organising nones is like herding cats. The evangelicals do not get their power from their number. They vote uniformly and reliably, turning out for every primary, local, and federal election.

      We are a diverse bunch with diverse opinions.

      • Chr0nos1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been a none for a bit now, and often find myself disagreeing with the opinions of others. I also tend to be more centrist in my political leanings, whereas a lot (obviously not all) of nones or atheists tend to lean left, or in some cases are extreme leftists. In my opinion, extreme leftists are as harmful to society as the extreme right, but that’s a pretty unpopular opinion online.

        Long story short, I agree with you on this.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you looked at the age of the average politician? It’ll change when they all die of old age and someone sensible from the younger generation takes over.

      • 🏳️‍⚧️ 新星 [she/they]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why is this take so popular? What do you think will happen when every politician of today is dead or retired? They’ll just be replaced with a new generation of mostly older people, who more importantly are there to serve their corporate masters.

        If you really think it’s about age, let’s try your country’s legislative body but every politician is a Marjorie Taylor Greene clone

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Around the time the majority of our lawmakers learned about the Vietnam war in a history book.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a question of attrition. Religiosity is dying out and so, in a sense, is neo-conservativism, and that’s why there is such a huge push to the right in many parts of the world. It’s the last desperate gasp of people who know that their time is up. They are doing everything they can to stop it from happening but it’s inevitable.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is that as moderate critical thinkers leave religious organizations the organizations are becoming more polarized by the foolhardy remnants which leads to large organizational efforts to do stupid nonsensical things.

  • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Instead of having anti lgbt protests, or anti abortion protests, we should really start having anti religion protests. They are really a cancer to society.

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe the anti-groups, who make it their mission to shit on someone else’s life are the real cancer to society… doesn’t matter that it is. If someone isn’t hurting anyone, live and let live.

        • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not every religious person does that though. What you’re saying isn’t much different than someone saying “Millennials are entitled and lazy,” it’s assigning something to a diverse group and ignoring the individual. Some religious people are pushy, but not all of them. There was religious guy I worked with years ago who was really into it, but he never pushed it. And if we started talking about stuff that made him uncomfortable, he’d simply go for a walk. He wouldn’t go to HR or preach to us, or anything like that. He’s just remove himself from the situation, let it pass, and come back. The pushy ones are a vocal minority.

          • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The problem is they are still part of the same group.

            If there is an anti lgbt protest organized by christians or muslims or whatever, sure im not saying 100% of all christians and muslims are there, but even if its 1% of the christians or muslims, these 1% are still in church with the rest of the christians or muslims, and the remaining 99% are not doing anything about it. They are not coning out and saying “That 1% of religious people are not a part of us”. They all care is about growing their religious groups, and anything else doesn’t matter.

            • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can almost guarantee you’re a hypocrite and are a member of some sort of “group”, by choice or not, that associates you with people doing things you, or others, think is evil.

              • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                First of all, I dont associate myself with people doing bad things to others. It’s really easy to do honestly. I recommend you to do it too.

                Second, are you saying is ok for religious people to be antilgbt because other people are part of some group, by choice or not, that associates with people doing things you, or others, think is evil?

                • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m saying you don’t know what everyone in every large group you’re apart of does. If you claim to, you’re lying. The groups some passer by could associate you with number in the millions or billions.

                  I’m saying that “religious people” is a massive group… 2.4B Christians, almost 2B Muslims, 1.2B Hindus, 500M Buddhists… and on we go… 6.6B people, or 85% of the globe, is in the group of “religious people”. Source.

                  To say being apart of that groups makes some antilgbt is crazy, as there are many lgbt people are members of that group. Are they all self-hating? You can’t assign guilt to a group of 6 billion people based on the actions of a few. I mean, you can, but no one should take you seriously. In a group of 6 billion people you will have a complete cross-section of the human experience. Everyone and everything, other than the specific thing you’re grouping by, will be represented. And since you’re controlling based on religion and not by opinions on lgbt people, all opinions on lgbt people will be represented in a group that large.

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the only thing we lose is community – I’m jealous that religious people automatically have that.

    The solution of course is trying to return to having neighborhood communities.

    • cjthomp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      Join a bowling league.

      Do anything every week with the same group and you’ll establish that same community…but without the grifting and shaming.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly I started playing pool at a local hall right by my house. Great way of meeting new people.

        Getting out and doing stuff in public is a great way of communicating.

      • SourWeasel@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds great, but the local bowling alley in my rural redneck town was just sold and converted to a community church. 🫤

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Go bowl down the isle of that church.

          Not like they need it on any day except Sundays.

          • SourWeasel@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually, I quite like the idea of secretly setting up some pins and rolling the ball down the aisle on a Sunday.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Love the idea here, but I wonder if there could be an alternative to religion/churches that still allows us to congregate and deliberate about meaningful, philosophical affairs that religion poked and prodded at.

        I know The Satanic Temple seeks to do this in a way, but I wonder if our universities and colleges held more opportunities to engage with the general public on meta/physics, epistemology, ethics, etc., topics also challenged by religion, we might fill the rational void people might be seeking.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m telling you from experience that their “community” is fake. The people are fake. Under the fake stuff that looks nice on the outside is a deep culture of judgment and shame and fear. It’s not any community I would ever want. Like family get together for family’s that hate each other but they fake it.

      To those who will try to tell me “well not ME or MY church.” I don’t care and I don’t believe you. I have been harmed too much too consistently by these groups.

        • Chr0nos1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like posting an unpopular opinion on Reddit or Lemmy. You’ll get down voted to hell if your opinion differs from the majority in that sub.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s just unpopular opinions, and I’ve made plenty of those before. It’s very different from doing something that my community thinks is a cosmic sin that will send me to hell.

            • ☆Luma☆@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m struggling to see how it’s different. Could you iterate a bit more? I’m a bit slow but I like learning :(

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Of course. It’s the nature of the disagreement. And unpopular opinion about random topics is just an unpopular opinion. People will see me as an idiot, ignorant, or stupid. They may think I have questionable morals or priorities. But that’s it. I’m just another stupid person on the Internet. I can have some of these disagreements with friends where I have an unpopular opinion, but depending on the severity it’s inconsequential.

                With a sin though, I’ve done something that goes against God’s word and rules. If I don’t ask for forgiveness, I will be eternally punished for it. Disagreements here are disagreements on what God says, which is heresy.

                Does that make more sense?

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are for sure exceptions to this. But by and large this is absolutely spot on in my experience. It feels like getting together with paid actors that are hired to be your friend or sell you sometime in the end sometimes.

      • kshade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Under the fake stuff that looks nice on the outside is a deep culture of judgment and shame and fear.

        Funny, that’s what Christianity seems to be mostly about anyway.

    • rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Try Humanism. Find your local chapter. Its the community of “church” without the need for god(s)

    • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The solution could be more rooted in philosophy too, but it’s been a long time, at least since the time of the Greeks or Romans, since we’ve had Schools dedicated to the deliberation of meta/physics, ethics, epistemology, etc.

      And I’m not talking about modern education here, the education that’s meant to bring up the youth and develop them into functioning adults. The Greek/Roman Schools to me seemed like places of conversation, debate, etc. that anyone could join (I know that philosophy was mostly restricted to the aristocracy in ancient times, but that would be the goal today).

      Maybe the answer is modern schools today, but with an effort to host local communities for thought discourse. Maybe it would look like wrapping together TED Talks with the minds of debates you see in New York that are like full blown events.

      And maybe universities do deliver this kind of activity for their community that I nor you have access to because they’re not near us. Dunno.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think another aspect to consider is that after the pandemic, multigenerational homes have become more common. There could be a really great sense of community in having a bunch of large families raise their children as a village.

    • rainynight65@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah yes, that sense of ‘community’ that only manifests when they all sit in their church, and vanishes the moment they all get back home.

      I get more of a sense of community out of my model railway forums and my live steam club.

      • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jesus is a real G compared to supply side right wing Jesus. If he ever does return, we’ll kill him again because he won’t be relatable to the rich.

        • kromem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if that dude were to return, he’d take one look at the modern day Pharisees his followers have become and think of the adage “burn me once, shame on you, burn me twice, shame on me” and keep his mouth shut this time around.

          It turns out that no, in fact there was no one with two good ears in the crowd after all, and only a fool would make that mistake twice.

      • rainynight65@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Jesus ever does come back, he won’t last ten minutes before they nail him to the cross again. Today’s Christianity is so far out of step with his supposed teachings, they might as well exist in different universes.

    • stewie3128@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or, you know, we could just ditch the church part entirely. Playing pretend about your favorite book is okay as a hobby I guess, but it doesn’t deserve government sanction or protection.

      I say this as someone who went to religious school until 9th grade, and was deeply involved in church through 12th grade.

      Read charitably, the Christian Bible is a bunch of fantasy role-playing bullshit. Read realistically, anything not attributed directly to Jesus is a bunch of pedantic repressive bullshit, with the occasional nice axiom thrown in (“grey hair is the splendor of the old” etc). The Apostle Paul, for example, was the original TCOT, and would be a megachurch pastor today. He just loved telling everyone how to live.

      Jesus - if he actually existed - went into temples with a whip and literally started flipping tables. Today, he’d be exiled from the church his followers founded because he’s too “liberal” and “weak.”

      Religion, and in particular the vast cult of that is American Evangelical Christianity, has no place in the modern world. If there is a God, they only take us further from him. It’s a tax-free business built on graft and hatred, which they relabel as “tolerance” and “love.”

      Cut off the tax-exempt status of any church or ministry that speaks to a political end (e.g. “Julie Green Ministries”). If they’re really that altruistic and pure of heart with clarity of purpose, it shouldn’t stop their mission.

      There is nothing special about expert knowledge in the fantasy world of the 1st and 2nd centuries. Theology is strictly a study of invented bullshit, with the aim of subjugating others. Even majoring in Harry Potter or the Star Wars Expanded Universe would be of greater benefit to society.

      Religion has no positive use.

  • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to have that really common thought of “I don’t care what you believe in. Just don’t try to push your opinion on me.”

    No. It’s bullshit.

    The very existence of religion is a psychological drain on society. We are all worse off the longer it stays around. There is no such thing as a good religious person and anyone who says they are religious I immediately distrust.

    • applebusch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. It’s at the root of a lot of the problems with conservatives in the US. Religion trains people in believing because they were told to believe, and holding to these beliefs in the face of all suffering and hardship. It’s a gateway drug to conspiracy theories and paranoid delusions.

    • Enkrod@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no such thing as a good religious person

      That’s a bridge too far for me.

      Yes, faith is in and off itself detrimental to our society. Religiosity is a strong detrimental force, a mind-virus, a meme that damages the ability to clearly perceive reality.

      But just like people who are infected with an infectious virus aren’t bad, not all religious people are automatically bad people. I don’t think they are good because they are religious, but that doesn’t mean they are not good or not religious. So let us not fall into the same absolutist thoughts as the fervent deniers of secular goodness.

      • Case@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed.

        I have met good people who are Christian. They usually don’t cowl all their behavior behind god.

        There you’re friends dad, who barely knows you, who helps you get your car running so his kid and friends can make it to a metal show. He didn’t like metal, but he kept it to himself other than saying it wasn’t his genre, which is a fair statement.

        Why did he devote an afternoon and a couple trips to auto zone? Because all in all we were good kids. He wanted us to have fun, but to arrive (and ultimately) come home safe.

      • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The comment you are responding to is reactionary in nature and surely the result of a great deal of pain and trauma at the hands of the sort of people they are referring to. In this case, I think it is ok to let someone express their emotions and assume that they don’t really mean for it to be a universal statement.

        • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why would you assume they don’t mean it to be universally applied?

          The biggest religions in the world harbor the largest rings of pedophiles, bigots and oppressors of women and children that exist.

          There are surely religious people that consider themselves good and act in a moral way, but their support of organizations that allow and defend such abhorrent values and behavior defies that.

          As someone put further down “the good ones enable the bad ones”. So while you or I might not take the same stance in our own lives, I can absolutely understand why someone might not want anything to do with religion or religious people.

          • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m trying to be charitable to the person who started this part of the thread. There are most definitely perfectly good religious people out there though they are involved with toxic organizations.

              • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                IRT the first part, I think so. Even if you’re a genuinely kind person, if you support an organization that practices cruelty, you are supporting cruelty.

                IRT the second part, I wasn’t saying that, but would agree with that statement–people are often a victim of their cultures.

    • Chunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t immediately distrust religious people but I do kind of roll my eyes and smirk a little bit on the inside.

      • Octavio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I’m lucky I can manage to keep the eyeroll and smirk on the inside. I’m kind of inelegant with social graces though.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a gay person, I have a saying that is similar: “When I meet someone who says they are conservative, I know that I have just met someone who wants me to suffer.”

      • Zealousideal_Fox900@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seeing people like J.J mcoloughs being gay and supporting the conservatives is the most dumbshit thing ever. Is he ever going to realize that most of the conservatives want him fucking dead??

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is it you hate so much about religion? I could see disliking specific religious practices, but what problem does every religion share that makes you immediately distrust all religious people?

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The conflation of personal belief with objective reality.

        When someone tells me they are religious, they are saying the voices in their heads are more important than the voices in their ears. They are saying the vision in their mind’s eye is more important than the vision in their eyeballs.

        When a schizophrenic tells us they are going to listen to the voices in their head, we should be worried. We should be worried even if their voices are currently telling them to be an upstanding member of society, because we don’t know what those voices will be saying tomorrow.

        • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I find the comparison between religion and schizophrenia to be a little over the top. There is a big difference between believing something that cannot be proven true, and having actual schizophrenic delusions.

          Religious beliefs don’t inherently impair your ability to function. And clearly they have some emotional function or value given that peoples around the world created their own unique religions without fail.

          I really don’t see why you care so much about what people believe as long as their beliefs aren’t hurting anyone else. You are creating a problem where there is none.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is a big difference between believing something that cannot be proven true, and having actual schizophrenic delusions.

            I would argue the former is the more worrying of the two. We all know not to trust the schizophrenic.

            But religious people aren’t just saying “God Bless You” when we sneeze. They are telling us how to vote, whether to wear masks, vaccinate our children, shun our neighbors, annihilate nations, and they are doing this on the basis of entirely unsupported, yet strongly held personal belief.

            You are creating a problem where there is none.

            Any suggestion that there isn’t a problem is demonstrably false, and your claim that I am creating the problem is gaslighting. I’m not going to waste a bunch of time pointing at a bunch of lesser religiously-supported evils to prove it. I’m just going to take them as read, and skip to the end: religious zealots fly planes into buildings.

            • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              But religious people aren’t just saying “God Bless You” when we sneeze. They are telling us how to vote, whether to wear masks, vaccinate our children, shun our neighbors, annihilate nations, and they are doing this on the basis of entirely unsupported, yet strongly held personal belief.

              Ah, so your problems with religion are actually problems with specific religious practices. Its almost like you should just hate those practices instead of directing your anger at a very broad concept.

              Your justification for distrusting all religious people is a small minority of Christians and Muslims. Grow up and treat people like people

              • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Ah, so your problems with religion are actually problems with specific religious practices.

                Where did you get that idea? I don’t believe that is a valid conclusion raising from my arguments.

                It’s almost like you should just hate those practices instead of directing your anger at a very broad concept.

                My “anger at a very broad concept” should have been a clue that those specific harmful practices I mentioned were exemplar, and not an exhaustive list. Further examples could be drawn from every organized religion, as well as from any and all individual “spiritual” beliefs.

                No, my distrust of religious people is not based solely on those few examples of harm that I have presented, but on the underlying philosophical model, which could be characterized as a preference for hypothesization over experimentation. This is a “content of character” question, not a condemnation of specific religions.

                • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  which could be characterized as a preference for hypothesization over experimentation.

                  This is an oversimplification of religion. There is a difference between someone’s religious beliefs, and how they approach logic in a real world situation. A religious person does not just always make a hypothesis and assume it to be true no matter what. They are capable of being normal functioning human beings and differentiating from fact and fiction outside of their religion. If they aren’t capable of this, then I agree its a problem. But its not a problem with religion, its a problem with the person.

                  So your problem is that people are believing things you disagree with because it gives them a sense of fulfillment and community without harming anyone else. It could not possibly be more clear that you are the problem.

                  And no, it is not gaslighting to point out why you are wrong about something. That’s a ridiculous tactic to avoid the tiniest bit of self reflection.

        • kicksystem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I couldnt agree more. I have totally underestimated how nutty religious people truly are. I used to think Christians are good neighbours and boring law abiding citizens, but when push comes to shove and you really need them it turns out that they are just nutcases who are very adept at playing the good neighbour role. At least that has been my experience. I just can’t trust adults who believe in fairy tales anymore.

        • dlrht@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I totally get what you’re saying, but that’s not at all what religion is. If someone is listening to voices in their head, they’re not religious. They’re just crazy. I know many religious people who do not “listen to voices in their head” and it’s my belief that you’ve had terrible encounters and experiences with people claiming to be religious. But to generalize is not a good thing. I’ve met very sane religious people that do not do the things you say, I think it’s unfair of you to make such a sweeping claim that anyone who claims to be religious is immediately a crazy person to you. That idea itself sounds crazy to me

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If someone is listening to voices in their head, they’re not religious. They’re just crazy.

            I did not mean to claim religious people are “crazy.” What I described is “faith”, but without the virtuous connotations commonly ascribed to that concept.

            Based on your comment, though, I would say I have accurately conveyed to you my state of mind upon hearing an individual proudly portray themselves as “religious” or “spiritual”. It is profoundly disturbing to hear someone readily admit a belief that their thoughts supersede reality.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be fair, a large amount of Christians, including many at the church I used to attend in my younger days, will often recommend they “Ask God for advice” on big or troubling decisions or issues in their life, and those people will then say “God told me to do X” after they asked God for help.

            So… I think there actually is a pretty fair amount of crazy religious types out there. The churches I’ve been to almost always had a big emphasis on getting to the point where you’re having a conversation with god, asking him for guidance, etc. I always interpreted that as being literal, and not a metaphor.

    • ThePenitentOne@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Religious people push their beliefs on people all the time, that’s what it is made to do so people can concentrate power. If a religious person has kids, you can guess how they are going to think. The whole idea is just complete bullshit and so stupid that anybody with a capacity to think critically knows it is false. Only people incapable of self reflection or thinking actually believe it.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s actually a little frightening, please refrain from making such blanket statements like this one. Surely a part of you must know this is wrong

      • kicksystem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I couldn’t agree more with the statement made. People who believe in fairy tales can’t be fully trusted.

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, that’s very short-sighted and factually incorrect. I wish you meet more people and your outlook changes

          • kicksystem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it is somewhat hard to change my outlook at this point. My reasoning is that truly devout religious people have been infected with a mind virus. They may be nice people or pretend to be nice people, but there is also the mind virus, which is ultimately not trust worthy. In general, if hard decisions need to be made by a third party that potentially have a big impact on my life I’d not fully trust a religious person.

            In daily life I am very friendly with a bunch of religious people, but I mistrust the religious part of them.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Never do business with a religious son-of-a-bitch. His word ain’t worth a shit – not with the Good Lord telling him how to fuck you on the deal.”

    ― William S. Burroughs

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read a really interesting book called How Minds Change: The Surprising Science of Belief, Opinion, and Persuasion, and the author made some very interesting points.

    It takes a seismic change in perspectives to change closely-held beliefs that are intertwined with our identities. I grew up as a devout Christian in an extremely conservative protestent young-earth-creationist denomination. I spent my Sundays and Wednesdays listening to the values preached from the pulpit: love, humility, repentance, understanding, protecting the vulnerable, meekness, charity, and unconditional love.

    However, these same people when outside of church would spew tirades about “the gays”, how poor people are just lazy, and how prayer wasn’t allowed in school anymore. The love that was exalted above all other values on Sunday was just a platitude to give cover to hateful grievance.

    And that was almost thirty years ago; they’ve only gotten worse. That’s why people are abandoning religion in droves. The values that they sell are not aligned with the actual values of their congregants. Like the old Jim Croce song, their philosophy is “Let him live in freedom - if he lives like me.”

    Furthermore, losing one’s religion nowadays is not the social exile it once was. People have support structures outside of organized religion. It’s one of the reasons that Evangelical churches are so against a social safety net: it keeps the excommunicated from crawling back.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People have support structures outside of organized religion.

      I agree with you overall, but do not agree with this point. There are very few non-commercial support structures in America for adults outside of organized religion, and even some of them (e.g. AA) are somewhat religious in nature.

  • TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really cant wrap my head that religion still exist in this age. Like we have mass destruction weapons, rockets that go beyond earth, have proof of how vast the universe is and then what we fight over is how some God has dictated our life to be.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s so dumb and pretentious. Like nobody knows why we’re here, if there is a creator or not, what happens when we die, etc. Religious people act like they really have the answers to these when they are so comically wrong and fooled by people pulling stuff out of their ass.

      Then, on top of that, to deny all of the things we have actually figured out about our universe and our place in it, the things we have actually observed. It’s a plague on humanity, stifling our progress.

      • TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. Exactly 💯.

        If the god was so powerful, where was he during CoVID? Why didnt the holy water treat COVID?

      • ThePenitentOne@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only purpose religion serves is copium for people who can’t face reality/don’t want to think, and exploitation of power. If God existed and gave a shit, it would be clear, but it’s so obviously man-made to anyone who wasn’t brainwashed to be religious.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every time I think about the fact that the belief that a dead body came back to life, floated up into the sky, and is expected to float back down at the end of the world isn’t considered to be a psychotic delusion because it’s so commonplace as to be normative I feel like I’m on crazy pills.

      How?

      How the heck do we live in an age of measuring how long it takes for light to cross a hydrogen atom, of seeing the complete observable universe, of building our own virtual universes - and yet intelligent people who are aware of or even involved in such efforts genuinely think magic is real?

      I get that there’s a lot of people who just don’t have a good grasp on reality and think lizards running world governments is somehow a probable explanation for the state of things, but the part that destroys a bit of my soul is seeing people who clearly should know better but don’t.

      How are we supposed to collectively solve real problems when so many are unwilling to come face to face with what is actually real?

      • kicksystem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        100%.

        I have that same problem with meat eaters too. How is it possible that we know we are brutally mass breeding and killing animals for food we don’t need, is fucking up the planet and isn’t all that healthy either, while at the same time also pretending to be civilized human beings that care about animals and the climare. And every time I raise the issue people make the dumbest excuses I have heard a thousand times…

        People, once brainwashed into a way of thinking and behaving, can just be really hard to change even if you have all the arguments on your side.

    • rainynight65@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have the same problem with monarchy. The only thing that disturbs me more than the existence of royals with their archaic rituals and inbred lines of succession is the fact that there are so many people who love that shit.

      Monarchies are also deeply intertwined with religion, which makes it extra problematic.

  • Drgon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The older I get the more angry the concept of God makes me. It’s hit the point where I hope I’m wrong, so when I die I can spit in his face and call Him a useless God

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The idea that their “love” god kills, maims, allows horrendous birth defects, molestation, etc of children is one of the multiple proofs that god doesn’t exist. Oh, and wasps and mosquitoes.

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The bible describes God as a manchild that gets upset and throws a tantrum when his playthings don’t function the way he wants them to. The loving, benevolent God only exists when things are going his will and then he gives out presents of kindness. It’s pretty much the definition of an abusive relationship with a narcissist.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Abusive narcissists control people, so why not make up a magical abusive narcissist to control a lot of people?

          • Adalast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh oh oh, let’s make him omnipotent and gaslight everyone by saying all the abuse is just his way of showing love so we can excuse our own toxic traits as holy.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Speaking of controlling people, isn’t it an interesting coincidence that the religions that tend to survive are the ones that say that the political leader (king, emperor, kaiser, tsar, chief, raj) has a divine right to rule, and is chosen by god? Also, what an interesting coincidence that whenever the king has a divine right to rule, the religious head seems to have a cushy life? How unusual is it that the suffering of common people is something that is good for your soul, especially if you bear the suffering silently.

            It’s like every successful religion coincidentally also sets up a society that’s easy for a leader to rule over. Crazy huh?!

      • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wasps pollinate plants and mosquitoes are an important step in the food web. Nothing in this existence is here for no reason and “god” to is show man’s own arrogance.

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re wrong, you’ll never see him, and just end up in hell getting things shoved up your butt, or whatever hell is.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are approx. 4000 religions out there today. Most of them have a rule saying “our religion is the right one, believe in the wrong one and terrible things happen to you after you die”. If one of those is right and 3999 of them are wrong, what are the odds of anybody picking the right one? Most believers don’t even put in the effort and learn all about the other 3999 to be sure that the one they picked is likely to be correct. They’re just gambling with a tiny chance of avoiding “hell”.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just have more and more trouble believing that actual functional adults believe in this crap. My mom is one of them, and I keep boggling at her ideas.

      Like, if she misplaces her keys then finds them, she thanks her god for finding them for her. Never blames it for hiding / losing the keys, of course. She’s absolutely confident that her beliefs match what her god wants, despite hers being picking and choosing from the various holy books. Her church isn’t quite mainstream for her religion. Her beliefs don’t quite match her church. But, of course, she’s right.

      A family friend of hers is dying of dementia. He is non-verbal and can no longer feed himself. Soon he’ll have to be on a feeding tube because he’ll no longer be able to swallow. This, of course, is her god’s plan. He wants a nurse to have to handle his waste and feed him with a tube. But, naturally, her god doesn’t want those same medical professionals to assist someone in dying with dignity.

      She also literally believes stories that are less believable than fairy tales. Apparently some holy person didn’t eat or drink for years! This other one healed people! Another one predicted future events! We know these are true because other people from that religion verified it, and if you can’t trust people of her religion, who can you trust?

      How can an adult stop believing in things like Santa Claus and underpants gnomes, but keep believing in this religious stuff?

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Religious orgs are cancer, they also steal tax dollars by avoiding taxes, corrupt organizations and their mansions